Believe the experts, the science says……
Dr Fauci in the States told Americans at the beginning of the pandemic that masks were ineffective to prevent Covid -19. However, a few weeks later, he said that he only gave this advice because he wanted to save masks for the health services. Are we to believe the first or the second declaration?
“I don’t regret anything I said then because the context of the time in which I said it, it was correct. We were told in our task force meetings that we have a serious problem with the lack of PPEs and masks for the health providers who are putting themselves in harm’s way every day to take care of sick people.” Dr Fauci
We seem to be lost in statistics, changing objectives and threats, but where is the truth? A blatant lie came in the discussions about hydroxychloroquine. Having spent much of my working life in West Africa, regularly taking Chloroquine, it was known as a drug that had almost no side effects, and had saved millions of lives.
Chloroquine (CQ) was first used as prophylaxis and treatment for maleria. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a more soluble and less toxic metabolite of chloroquine, which causes fewer side effects and is therefore even safer.1
We must question whether that is because Big Pharma wants us to be vaccinated with all the financial implications that are involved. Instead of open discussion, organisations like the BBC simply declare that there is no evidence that hydroxychloroquine works.
Quoting the prestigious journal the Lancet the BBC reported the drug U.S. President Donald Trump said he was taking to ward off Covid -19 actually increases the risk of patients with the disease dying from it.2 But it did not investigate the matter further.
(For a further discussion on this subject, go to the following link:
https//talkingsense.org.uk/home/covid-19/treatment/treatment/)
What is happening here? Under government pressure, we are being funnelled into a track where we are no longer allowed to question the establishment view. Also to question that view publicly could lead to establishment censure, including the use of the courts with financial penalties or possibly jail!
We know that we are being pushed to tell lies…when I see a 6 foot person with a beard, I am now being told to accept that they are fully female if the person in question decides that they are female. If the system can force us to knowingly lie, they can force us to do anything. (see The Big Lie: Dinesh D’Souza)3
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. (Joseph Goebbels)
Note, “the truth is the greatest enemy of the State”. We must be ever vigilant of a State that forces us to not only accept things that we know are false, but to openly declare our support for those ideas. As we watch athletes taking the knee and declaring ‘Black Lives Matter’ with the Black Power Fist, do any of them know what they are supporting?
The very manipulative use of language (paedophiles become MAPs – Minor Attracted Persons; radical Marxists/Fascists become Antifa) makes it impossible to disagree with the statement that Black Lives Matter, but that organisation is Marxist, and believes in the abolition of the nuclear family.
“We disrupt the Western-presecribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable”.
If we are to hold on to free speech (or maybe even regain our free speech), we have to pick our battles. We cannot allow the gradual erosion of the lines, we must stand firm on truth- no compromise. In no way can we permit the authorities to dictate our speech, because if we don’t, so much worse will follow.
First they cam for the Socialists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemoller
2https://www.brietbart.com/europe/2020/06/07/lancetgate-is-a-humiliation-for-trumps-medical-critics/
3https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1621573486